Not logged in.     Guide for Users  - AJAS User's Guide General Information _Site map _Guides for subscribed members and non-subscribed authors and visitors _Declaration by Authors Form Guides for Registration, Manuscript Submission and Review _Getting username and password _Manuscript Submission _Reviewing process _Payment _Publication and print Guide for Reviewers _Steps for manuscript review _Guide for reviewers _Reviewer's commitment Guide for Technical Committee _Overview of reviewing process _Guide for Technical committee _Technical Committee’s commitment Payment Policy of the AJAS _Reprint and Page Charge _2009 Subscription and Renewal Form [MS-WORD]   Main window(before log-in) Main window(after log-in) Right and access limits Access limits for non-subscriber authors or visitors - Username and password(register here) - Manuscript submission (see guides for authors/register) - Paper search - Abstract access Access limits for subscriber(register here) - Manuscript submission - Paper search - Abstract access - Full paper access(PDF file) - Full paper print - Full paper download Registration Submission Overview How to Pay Page Charge How to Order Reprint Overview Steps for review Commitment Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences Guidelines for Referees Please use this sheet to assist you in formulating your comments on the attached referee's report. Your comments will assist the author when revising the manuscript. Please number your comments sequentially, so that each comment can be responded to individually by the authors.   Is the paper acceptable for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science? AJAS invites original scientific papers and authoritative reviews in the broad areas of animal science. In general submitted manuscripts should address a well defined problem or set of problems and include a formal statistical analysis of the results, producing outcomes of direct relevance to the original problem identified. Poorly defined studies without clear objectives and appropriate analysis are not acceptable. Important questions to ask include :   a) Does the subject matter fall within the general scope of the journal?   b) Is it a significant, novel and original contribution (this does not need to apply to review articles)?   c) Are the interpretations sound, and based upon good experimental methods and analysis? If the answer to any of these points is negative, the paper should be rejected. Otherwise please consider and, if necessary, comment upon the following.   a) Does the title clearly reflect the contents?   b) Is the abstract sufficiently informative, especially when read in isolation?   c) Is the statement of objectives or hypotheses adequate and appropriate in view of the subject matter presented?   d) Does the experimental design allow adequate testing of the hypotheses or objectives set?   e) Is the description of materials and methods sufficiently informative to allow replication of the experiment?   f) Are the statistical methods used correct and adequate?   g) Are the results clearly and concisely presented?   h) Is the interpretation of work adequate and supported by the data presented?   I) Is the relevance of the work to the field of investigation made clear?   j) Is the organization and structure of the paper satisfactory? Is the material presented in a concise, logical manner that can be easily understood?   k) Is the paper structured in accordance with the "Guide for Authors"?   l) Is the length of the paper appropriate for its content? Does it require expansion or condensation?   m) Are the figures and tables all necessary, complete (e.g. with complete, informative captions) and clearly presented? Are they all cited in the text? Is there duplication of data in the text and in tables and figures?   n) Are the references adequate and presented in the appropriate style?   o) What is the quality of English expression, spelling and grammar? Does the manuscript require the services of the AJAS English editor? Overview Reviewing process