Comparison of In vivo and In vitro Techniques for Methane Production from Ruminant Diets
Raghavendra Bhatta (Bhatta R), K. Tajima (Tajima K), N. Takusari (Takusari N), K. Higuchi (Higuchi K), O. Enishi (Enishi O), M. Kurihara (Kurihara M)
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2007;20(7):1049-1056.   Published online 2007 Jun 27     DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1049
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
In-vitro digestibility and methane gas emission of indigenous and introduced grasses in the rangeland ecosystems of south eastern Kenya
Annastacia Nduku Maweu, Bockline Omedo Bebe, Simon Gichuru Kuria, Olivier Basole Kashongwe
Regional Environmental Change.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
The effects of dietary medium‐chain fatty acids on ruminal methanogenesis and fermentation in vitro and in vivo: A meta‐analysis
Yulianri Rizki Yanza, Małgorzata Szumacher‐Strabel, Anuraga Jayanegara, Andre Meiditama Kasenta, Min Gao, Haihao Huang, Amlan Kumar Patra, Ewelina Warzych, Adam Cieślak
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.2021; 105(5): 874.     CrossRef
Response to Climate Change: Evaluation of Methane Emissions in Northern Australian Beef Cattle on a High Quality Diet Supplemented with Desmanthus Using Open-Circuit Respiration Chambers and GreenFeed Emission Monitoring Systems
Bénédicte Suybeng, Felista W. Mwangi, Christopher S. McSweeney, Edward Charmley, Christopher P. Gardiner, Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli, Aduli E. O. Malau-Aduli
Biology.2021; 10(9): 943.     CrossRef
In vitro gas production and cinetical fermentation of a few local feed in Kupang East Nusa Tenggara
M M Kleden, E Hartati, M R D Ratu, G A Y Lestari, A E Manu
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2021; 888(1): 012077.     CrossRef
Methane Mitigation Potential of Foliage of Fodder Trees Mixed at Two Levels with a Tropical Grass
Sara Stephanie Valencia-Salazar, Guillermo Jiménez-Ferrer, Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero, Juan Carlos Ku-Vera, Ngonidzashe Chirinda, Jacobo Arango
Agronomy.2021; 12(1): 100.     CrossRef
Farklı Bölgelerde Yetişen Söğüt Yapraklarının Potansiyel Besleme Değerlerinin ve Anti-Metanojenik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi
Tuğba CENGİZ, Adem KAMALAK
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi.2020; 23(5): 1351.     CrossRef
Effect of the addition of Enterolobium cyclocarpum pods and Gliricidia sepium forage to Brachiaria brizantha on dry matter degradation, volatile fatty acid concentration, and in vitro methane production
Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero, Johanna Mazabel, Jeyder Arceo-Castillo, José Luis Urrea-Benítez, Leticia Olivera-Castillo, Rolando Barahona-Rosales, Ngonidzashe Chirinda, Juan Ku-Vera, Jacobo Arango
Tropical Animal Health and Production.2020; 52(6): 2787.     CrossRef
Effects of nitrate supplementation and forage level on gas production, nitrogen balance and dry-matter degradation in sheep
M. Sharifi, A. Taghizadeh, A. A. Khadem, A. Hosseinkhani, H. Mohammadzadeh
Animal Production Science.2019; 59(3): 515.     CrossRef
Rumen-protected methionine a feed supplement to low dietary protein: effects on microbial population, gases production and fermentation characteristics
Imtiaz Hussain Raja Abbasi, Farzana Abbasi, Lihui Liu, Bello M. Bodinga, Mervat A. Abdel-Latif, Ayman A. Swelum, Mohamed Abdalla Elsiddig Mohamed, Yangchun Cao
AMB Express.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
In vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of goat and sheep supplemented with polyunsaturated fatty acids
S. C. L. Candyrine, M. F. Jahromi, M. Ebrahimi, J. B. Liang, Y. M. Goh, N. Abdullah
Animal Production Science.2017; 57(8): 1607.     CrossRef
Effect of species on chemical composition, metabolisable energy, organic matter digestibility and methane production of oak nuts
Cagri Ozgur Ozkan
Journal of Applied Animal Research.2016; 44(1): 234.     CrossRef
Rumen methane output and fermentation characteristics of gramineous forage and leguminous forage at differing harvest dates determined using an in vitro gas production technique
Rong-zhen ZHONG, Yi FANG, Hai-xia SUN, Min WANG, Dao-wei ZHOU
Journal of Integrative Agriculture.2016; 15(2): 414.     CrossRef
Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants—a review
D.R. Yáñez-Ruiz, A. Bannink, J. Dijkstra, E. Kebreab, D.P. Morgavi, P. O’Kiely, C.K. Reynolds, A. Schwarm, K.J. Shingfield, Z. Yu, A.N. Hristov
Animal Feed Science and Technology.2016; 216: 1.     CrossRef
Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants
Amlan K. Patra
Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
Comparison of feed intake, body weight gain, enteric methane emission and relative abundance of rumen microbes in steers fed sainfoin and lucerne silages under western Canadian conditions
K. Bouchard, K. M. Wittenberg, G. Legesse, D. O. Krause, E. Khafipour, K. E. Buckley, K. H. Ominski
Grass and Forage Science.2015; 70(1): 116.     CrossRef
Relationship between in vitro and in vivo methane production measured simultaneously with different dietary starch sources and starch levels in dairy cattle
B. Hatew, J.W. Cone, W.F. Pellikaan, S.C. Podesta, A. Bannink, W.H. Hendriks, J. Dijkstra
Animal Feed Science and Technology.2015; 202: 20.     CrossRef
Start-up and maturation phases of a full-scale, high-rate anaerobic pond bioreactor® plus improved facultative ponds to treat municipal wastewater
M. R. Peña, A. Aponte, A. F. Toro
Water Science and Technology.2015; 71(4): 503.     CrossRef
Meta‐analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments
A. Jayanegara, F. Leiber, M. Kreuzer
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.2012; 96(3): 365.     CrossRef
Modifications of a gas production technique for assessing in vitro rumen methane production from feedstuffs
A. Navarro-Villa, M. O’Brien, S. López, T.M. Boland, P. O’Kiely
Animal Feed Science and Technology.2011; 166-167: 163.     CrossRef
An evaluation of the methane output associated with high-moisture grains and silages using the in vitro total gas production technique
E. J. Mc Geough, P. O'Kiely, M. O'Brien, D. A. Kenny
Animal Production Science.2011; 51(7): 627.     CrossRef