1. Pertanian Kementrian. Indonesian livestock and animal health statistics. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementrian Pertanian Republik Indonesia; 2018.
2. Biagini D, Lazzaroni C. Eutrophication risk arising from intensive dairy cattle rearing systems and assessment of the potential effect of mitigation strategies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2018; 266:76–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.026
3. De Vries M, Wouters APB, Vellinga T. Environmental impacts of dairy farming in lembang, west java. Wageningen the Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS); 2017. Working Paper No: 221
4. Laubach J, Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Gibbs SJ, Sherlock RR, Kelliher FM, Grover SPP. Ammonia emissions from cattle urine and dung excreted on pasture. Biogeosciences 2013; 10:327–38.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-327-2013
6. Qu QB, Yang P, Zhao R, et al. Prediction of fecal nitrogen and phosphorus excretion for Chinese Holstein lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2017; 95:3487–96.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1432
9. Weiss WP, St-Pierre NR, Willett LB. Factors affecting manure output on dairy farms. In : Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference 2007; 2007 April 24–25; Wayne Ft IN, USA.
10. Weisbjerg MR, Hvelplund T, Søegaard K. Prediction of digestibility of neutral detergent solubles using the Lucas principle. J Anim Feed Sci 2004; 13:Suppl 1239–42.
https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/73849/2004
11. Lucas HL. Stochastic elements in biological models; their sources and significance. Stochastic Models in Medicine and Biology. Madison, WI, USA: University Wisconsin Press; 1964.
12. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd EdIthaca, NY, USA: Cornell Univ Press; 1994.
13. Krizsan SJ, Alamouti HM, Rinne M, Huhtanen P. Indigestible neutral detergent fibre in predictions of grass and red clover silage digestibility. Grass Forage Sci 2014; 69:266–75.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12029
14. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle Seventh revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2001.
15. Alvarez-Fuentes G, Appuhamy JADRN, Kebreab E. Prediction of phosphorus output in manure and milk by lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:771–82.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10092
17. Feedipedia. Animal Feed Resources Information System [Internet]. INRA CIRAD AFZ and FAO; 2012–2019. [cited 2018 Dec]. Available from:
https://www.feedipedia.org/
18. Tatra AJ, Abdullah L, Despal . Effective fibre availability and tannin existence in Lembang traditional dairy farms ration and their influence on milk production and quality [master’s thesis]. Bogor, Indonesia: Bogor Agricultural University; 2015.
19. Kusuma SB, Ngadiyono N, Sumadi S. The correlation of body measurements and weights of ongole crossbred (po) cattle in Kebumen Regency. In : Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production 2017; 2017 Sept 12–14; Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
20. Aprily NU, Sambodho P, Harjanti DW. Calving evaluation of dairy cattle in balai besar pembibitan ternak unggul dan hijauan pakan ternak baturraden. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia 2016; 18:36–43.
21. Salman LB, Sumantri C, Noor RR, Saefuddin A, Talib C. Growth curve of Frisian-Holstein birth to first mating age using logistic mathematical model. Informatika Pertanian 2014; 23:73–84.
22. Bibby J, Toutenburg H. Prediction and improved estimation in linear models. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd EdNew York, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1998.
24. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. Indonesian national standard for concentrate feed of dairy cattle [internet]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standarisasi Nasional; c2009. [cited 2018 Dec]. Available from:
https://bsn.go.id/
25. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. Indonesian national standard for fresh milk [internet]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standarisasi Nasional; c1998. [cited 2018 Dec]. Available from:
https://bsn.go.id/
26. Wattiaux MA. Protein metabolism in dairy cows. Technical dairy guide nutrition. 2nd edMadison, WI, USA: The Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research and Development, The University of Wisconsin; 1998.
27. Van Vliet PCJ, Reijs JW, Bloem J, Dijkstra J, De Goede RGM. Effects of cow diet on the microbial community and organic matter and nitrogen content of feces. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:5146–58.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0065
29. Oosting SJ, Vlemmix PJ, Van Bruchem J. Effect of ammonia treatment of wheat straw with or without supplementation of potato protein on intake, digestion and kinetics of comminution, rumen degradation and passage in steers. Br J Nutr 1994; 72:147–65.
https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19940016
30. Van der Linden A, Van de Ven GWJ, Oosting SJ, Van Ittersum MK, De Boer IJM. LiGAPS-Beef, a mechanistic model to explore potential and feed-limited beef production 3: Model evaluation. Animal 2019; 13:868–78.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002641
31. Haegele MT, Arjharn W. The effects of cultivation methods and planting season on biomass yield of Napier grass (
Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) under rainfed conditions in the northeast region of Thailand. Field Crops Res 2017; 214:359–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.027
33. Garg MR, Sherasia PL, Phondba BT, Makkar HPS. Greenhouse gas emission intensity based on lifetime milk production of dairy animals, as affected by ration-balancing program. Anim Prod Sci 2018; 58:1027–42.
https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15586
34. Duarte CM, Amthor JS, De Angelis DL, et al. The limits to models in ecology. Models in ecosystem science. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press; 2003. p. 437–51.