Go to Top Go to Bottom
Sharif, Shahzad, Rehman, Khan, Ali, Khan, and Khan: Nutritional Evaluation of Distillery Sludge and Its Effect as a Substitute of Canola Meal on Performance of Broiler Chickens

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the chemical composition of distillery yeast sludge and its inclusion in broiler diets to replace canola meal. Raw distillery yeast sludge was washed with water using water and sludge in the ratio 6:1, respectively. Proximate analysis of raw distillery yeast sludge and washed distillery sludge was carried out for crude protein (CP), true protein (TP), ether extract (EE), ash, acid insoluble ash and nitrogen free extract (NFE) determination. Mineral contents and amino acid profile of raw distillery yeast sludge and washed distillery sludge were also determined. After chemical evaluation, four iso-caloric and iso-nitrogenous broiler starter and finisher diets were prepared in mash form using 0 (control), 4, 8 and 12% levels of washed distillery sludge replacing canola meal. One hundred and twenty day-old broiler chicks were randomly distributed into 12 experimental units in such a way that each diet was offered to three experimental units, each comprising of 10 chicks. It was observed that washing affected the nutrients either by decreasing or increasing their concentration. It decreased the total mineral contents whereas CP, TP, EE and NFE contents increased. Washing also increased amino acid profile. Average feed intake and weight gain were higher in birds fed diet containing 8% washed distillery sludge and lower in birds fed diet containing 0% washed distillery sludge. Feed cost per kg live weight gain decreased significantly as the level of washed distillery sludge was increased in the diet. Average heart, liver and pancreas weights decreased with increased level of washed distillery sludge in the diet. The study revealed that after washing, distillery yeast sludge can be used successfully in broiler diets up to the level of 8% without any adverse effect on broiler’s performance.

INTRODUCTION

Poultry industry is one of the fastest growing sectors in developing countries like Pakistan with an average growth rate of 8 to 10 percent annually (Economic Survey, 2009–2010). Due to rapid increase in human population and poultry production, there is an active competition between human beings and poultry for feed. This results in scarcity and high cost of feedstuffs which contribute poor performance to the poultry as poultry feed accounts for 65 to 75 percent of the total cost of production (Esonu et al., 2006). This unprecedented increase in the cost of conventional feedstuffs has necessitated intensive investigations to explore alternate and non-conventional feed sources available at cheaper rates without reducing the nutritive value of the diet. Production and utilization of single cell protein (SCP) is an important attempt to solve these problems (Shahzad et al., 2011). The term SCP refers to the dead, dried cells of beneficial species of microbes such as yeast, bacteria, fungi, and algae (Ware, 1977). It is characterized by high concentration of nucleotides, inositol and glutamic acid (Silva et al., 2009). Yeast protein has beneficial effect on broiler performance (Silva et al., 2009; Pelícia et al., 2010; Haldar et al., 2011).
Distillery industry produces a great quantity of distillery yeast sludge (DYS), whose management and disposal are environmental problems due to their seasonal availability and some polluting characteristics (Bustamante et al., 2008). Approximately 1,300 tons (dry matter (DM) basis) of DYS is being wasted each year in Pakistan (Khan, 2001) as we consider it to be a toxic waste. Initial studies on the available DYS in Pakistan indicate that it contains great inherent nutritional potential to be utilized as an economical source of SCP for poultry, because it has 27 to 29% crude protein (Ali, 2004). However, it contains exclusively higher mineral content which is the main limitation towards its extensive use. The following study was, therefore, planned to reduce the mineral content of distillery sludge, by washing and to utilize the washed distillery sludge (dried) as a source of protein to replace different levels of canola meal in broiler diets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiment was conducted at Animal Nutrition Research Station, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan, to investigate the chemical composition of washed distillery sludge (WDS) and its effect on broiler performance by replacing it with canola meal. Raw distillery yeast sludge (RDS) was washed at the rate of 6:1 (water:sludge). For this, 150 kg distillery sludge was washed by adding 900 kg water. The material was placed unmoved for 8 h, which allowed the biomass to settle at the base. After this, water collected above the biomass was removed simply by tilting the container. The biomass remained after washing and removal of water was sun dried. One hundred and fifty square feet floor space was washed to remove dust and the biomass was poured over the area for drying. The flakes of dried WDS were removed by using scraper and ground in the hammer mill to a mash size of 2 mm.
Proximate analysis of RDS and WDS was carried out for crude protein (CP), true protein (TP), ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF), ash, acid insoluble ash (AIA) and nitrogen free extract (NFE) determination according to the procedure described by AOAC (1990). The gross energy of RDS and WDS were determined by using Parr Adiabatic Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter (Nukamp, 1965), amino acid profile was determined by using Beckman Automatic Amino Acid Analyzer, model 120-C. The RDS and WDS were also analyzed for mineral contents among which calcium, magnesium, manganese, iron, zinc, copper, cobalt and chromium were analyzed by spectrophotometery, sodium and potassium by flame photometer while phosphorus was analyzed photometrically via Spectronic 1001 (Milton Roy Co., Cincinnati, OH).
Four iso-caloric (ME 3,000 kcal/kg DM) and iso-nitrogenous (CP 22%) broiler starter diets were prepared in mash form using 0 (control), 4, 8 and 12% levels of WDS replacing canola meal (Table 3). All diets were formulated to cover the nutrient requirements of chicken (NRC, 2001). Similarly, four iso-caloric (ME 3,000 kcal/kg DM) and iso-nitrogenous (CP 20%) broiler finisher diets were prepared as mash, in the same manner (Table 4).
One hundred and twenty day-old broiler chicks (Hubbard) were purchased from the local market. The chicks were randomly distributed into 12 experimental units in such a way that each diet was offered to three experimental units, each comprising of 10 chicks. These chicks were then marked for identification. Standard management practices of commercial broiler production were applied. Chicks were vaccinated against New-castle disease at 5 and 25 d of age and Infectious bursal disease (IB) at 9, 19 and 29 d of age.
The study lasted for 6 wk; 0 to 4 wk for starter phase and 5 to 6 wk for finisher phase. All the experimental birds were weighed at the start of the study and on weekly basis thereafter. All the groups were fed the allotted diets at ad libitum. Daily feed offered and refused were weighed and at the end of each week, feed consumption was recorded. Feed consumption and weight gain were recorded separately for starter and finisher phase. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was also calculated for starter and finisher phase. Cumulative data for all feed consumption, weight gain and FCR were calculated. Cost/kg of live weight gain was calculated. Mortality was also recorded to determine the survivability percentage.
At the end of the experiment, three birds from each experimental unit were randomly slaughtered to determine the dressing percentage, weights of liver, gizzard, heart, pancreas and thymus and intestinal length.

Statistical analysis

The data regarding chemical composition of RDS and WDS were analyzed using t-test statistics (Steel et al., 1997), while the data regarding performance trial were analyzed using analysis of variance technique with completely randomized design. The treatment means were compared by least significance difference (LSD) test (Steel et al., 1997).

RESULTS

Nutritional potential of distillery sludge

Nutrient composition of RDS and WDS is given in Table 1 and 2. It was observed that washing affects most of the nutrients, either by decreasing or increasing the concentration of the respective nutrient. The data revealed that washing decreased (46.19%) the total mineral content significantly (p<0.01) from 22.08 to 11.88%. The CP, EE and NFE values increased significantly (p<0.01), as a result of washing. The CP contents of RDS and WDS were 27.40 and 34.80% which indicated 27% increase due to washing effect. Similarly, EE and NFE also increased with washing and this increase was 1.10 to 1.20% and 49.52 to 52.22%, respectively. However, washing didn’t affect the CF fraction (Table 1).
The WDS had higher metabolizable energy and TP values than RDS. Washing increased 7.95% (2,200 to 2,375 kcal/kg) metabolizable energy and 55.80% (18.10 to 28.20%) TP (Table 1) of WDS than RDS. Macro as well as micro minerals exhibited a significant decrease (p>0.01), as a result of washing. Percent decrease was 61.33 in Ca, 54.91 in P, 63.26 in K, 50.00 in Na, 40.00 in Mg, 60.00 in Mn, 44.84 in Fe, 20.00 in Zn, 26.66 in Cu and 33.33 in Co. However, washing had non-significant effect on Cr (Table 1).
Washing resulted in significant increase in amino acid profile of WDS. It was observed that washing increased 26 to 27.5% each amino acid profile (Table 2). However, the ratio among various amino acids remained the same for RDS as well as WDS.

Weight gain

Average weight gain in birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS were 910, 943, 978 and 969 g, in the starter phase, 560, 562, 719 and 679 g, in the finisher phase and 1,470, 1,505, 1,697 and 1,649 g, 3,048 g, in the starter-cum-finisher phase, respectively (Table 5). During starter phase, the birds fed diets containing 8 and 12% WDS gained significantly more (p<0.01) weight than those fed diets containing 0 and 4% WDS. During finisher phase, birds fed diet containing 8% WDS gained higher (p<0.01) weight than all other treatments. Overall, the highest live weight gain was observed in birds fed diet containing 8% WDS.

Feed intake

During starter phase, maximum (1,503 g) and minimum (1,398 g) feed intakes were observed in birds fed diets containing 12 and 0% WDS, respectively (Table 5). During finisher phase, the highest (p<0.01) feed consumption was observed in birds fed diet containing 8% WDS while, the lowest (p>0.01) in birds fed diets containing 0 and 4% WDS. Average feed intake was higher (p<0.01) in birds fed diet containing 8% WDS than all other treatments.

Feed conversion ratio

Average feed conversion ratio of birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS were 1.54, 1.53, 1.51 and 1.55, in the starter phase, 2.44, 2.46, 2.40 and 2.38, in the finisher phase and 1.88, 1.88, 1.89 and 1.88, in the starter-cum-finisher phase, respectively. Apparently, birds fed diet containing 12% WDS consumed more feed per unit weight gain than those fed diet containing 0, 4 and 8% WDS during starter phase, but statistically the difference was non-significant. Similarly, during finisher phase, birds fed diet containing 4% WDS consumed more feed per unit weight gain but statistically, it was non-significant. Overall FCR remained unaffected by WDS supplementation in the diet.

Economics

Overall, feed cost per kg live weight gains in birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS were 0.62, 0.56, 0.50 and 0.48 $ (US), respectively. This showed that feed cost per kg live weight gains decreased significantly with the increase in the level of WDS.

Survivability percentage

During starter phase, there was 0% mortality in all birds fed diet with or without WDS which indicates 100% survivability. Average survivability percentages were 90.00, 93.33, 96.66 and 100.00 in birds fed 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS, respectively during finisher as well as starter-cum-finisher phases.

Dressing percentage and slaughter parameters

Average dressing percentage in birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS was 65.78, 65.13, 65.89 and 66.20, respectively. The highest value was observed in birds fed diets containing 12% WDS and the lowest in birds fed diets containing 4% WDS but the difference was statistically non-significant.
Average liver weights per 100 g of live weights were 2.40, 2.26, 2.12 and 2.16 g respectively, in birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. So there was significant reduction (p<0.01) in liver weights as the level of WDS was increased in the diets. Average gizzard weights per 100 g live weight gains were 1.67, 1.96, 2.10 and 1.75 g respectively for birds fed diets with 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. Minimum and maximum gizzard weight was observed in birds fed diets containing 0 and 8% WDS, respectively.
Average heart weights per 100 g live weight gains were 444.60, 401.90, 366.00 and 376.60 mg respectively, for birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. Significant decrease (p>0.01) in heart weights was observed in birds fed diets containing WDS. Average thymus weights per 100 g live weights were 589.50, 532.96, 503.69 and 541.10 mg respectively, for birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. The lowest value of thymus weight was observed in birds fed diet containing 8% WDS while the highest in birds fed diet containing 0% WDS. However, statistically the difference was non-significant. Average pancreas weights per 100 g were 360.30, 335.40, 335.00 and 289.70 mg respectively, for birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. The maximum weight of pancreas was observed in birds fed diet containing 0% WDS which decreased gradually with increasing the levels of WDS. Average intestinal lengths per 100 g live weights were 11.13, 11.95, 9.855 and 10.75 respectively, for birds fed diets containing 0, 4, 8 and 12% WDS. The diet containing 8% WDS showed significant decrease in the intestinal length.

DISCUSSION

Nutritional potential of distillery sludge

Our findings to use DYS after washing are in concordance with Rameshwari and Karthikeyan (2005) who reported that WDS can be used successfully in poultry diet without any adverse effect. Washing affects most of the nutrients, either by increasing or decreasing their contents. The total mineral content (ash) decreased by 46.19% as RDS contains higher mineral content and most of these minerals are water soluble (Table 1). During washing, these minerals were solublized in water and were eliminated along with water, resulting in decreased mineral content. This decrease ultimately led to the reciprocal increase in other nutrients including CP, EE, NFE and ME. True protein increased almost twice as that of CP which was due to the fact that RDS contains non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source i.e. diammonium phosphate which is also water soluble. Reduction in NPN% results in reciprocal increase in true protein percentage. This indicates that washing reduces the total mineral content, as well as water soluble NPN substances present in RDS. The changes in other nutrients are only the result of reciprocal increase, in order to fill the gap created by the reduction of mineral content and NPN substances. However, no change was observed in either the CF contents or amino acid profiler, as washing didn’t affect them. The amino acid profile indicates a superior quality protein. These findings are in agreement with Yalcın et al. (2008) who reported brewing dried yeast as a good source of quality protein.

Weight gain

Significant improvement in live weight gain was observed as the level of WDS was increased up to 8%. The possible reason for this might be higher feed intake, digestibility and biological value of protein present in WDS. Decreased weight gain at higher level of WDS i.e. 12% might be due to reduced feed intake which was associated with higher level of nucleic acids (Oliva-Teles and Goncalves, 2001). Similar findings were observed by Khan (2001) who reported that increasing the level of RDS up to 6% improved weight gain in birds while 9% RDS had adverse effect on live weight gain. In another study, it was found that inclusion of distillery sludge up to 5% in bird’s diet has no detrimental effects while increasing the level up to 10% retarded growth (Goto et al., 1974). Similarly, Machalek et al. (1988) reported that replacing soyabean meal with equal amount of brewer’s yeast having 48% CP resulted in improved weight gain. Other researchers (Churchil and Mohan, 2000; Nilson et al., 2004; Paryad and Mahmoudi, 2008) also found that inclusion of yeast in broiler diets improved weight gain.

Feed consumption

Significantly higher feed consumption in birds fed diet containing 8% WDS compared to lower levels of WDS was possibly due to the fact that distillery sludge is a rich source of vitamins especially B-complex, oligomonosaccharides (natural aflatoxin binder) and unidentified nutrients, all of which might have contributed to increase the palatability of diet. Our findings are consistent with Gomez and Angeles (2011) who reported that feeding of yeast resulted in better feed intake. Herria and Garcia (1983) found that incorporating yeast up to 7% in the diet replacing soyabean meal improved feed intake. Khan (2001) also reported that feed intake increased significantly with increasing the level of RDS up to 6% but above than that, feed intake was reduced. The reason for decreased feed intake in birds fed diet containing 12% WDS might be due to higher level of nucleic acids (Oliva-Teles and Goncalves, 2001). Rumsey et al. (1991) also found a decline in feed intake with increasing levels of brewer’s dried yeast. Zerai et al. (2008) noticed depressed feed intake with increasing the levels of brewer’s yeast. The probable reason for this might be higher levels of brewer’s yeast (45%) used to replace fish meal.

Feed conversion ratio

The results revealed non-significant differences in FCR among diets containing different levels of WDS. Kahraman et al. (1997) also reported non-significant difference among treatment groups supplemented with organic acid (acid dry 3 g/kg), yeast culture (yea sacc1026 1 g/kg) and organic acid and yeast culture (acid lac dry 3 g/kg and yea sacc 1026 1 g/kg), respectively. Contrary to these, Nilson et al. (2004) found better FCR in birds fed yeast containing diets. Khan (2001) also reported that FCR was significantly improved in diets containing 6% RDS. Other researchers (Santin et al., 2001; Nilson et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005) observed similar findings. This is due to the reason that distillery sludge is a rich source of vitamins, oligomonosaccharides, and some unidentified nutrients, which contributed better FCR.

Economics

Decrease in feed cost/kg live weight gain with increasing the levels of WDS was due to low cost of production of WDS which was 50% cheaper than canola meal. Similarly findings were also reported by Magalhaes et al. (2008) who found 14.6% more profit on feeding yeast in the diet compared to control.

Survivability percentage

Although survivability percentage increased gradually with increasing the level of WDS but statistically the difference was non-significant. Teeter (1992) also reported that yeast culture had non-significant effect on survivability in birds. Similar findings were also reported by Tovar et al. (2002). Contrary to these, Magalhaes et al. (2008) reported improved survival rate through feeding yeast culture. This is due to the reason that yeast is rich source of oligosaccharides such as glucan which improved neutrophil chemotaxis activity (Murphy et al., 2007). This might have improved phagocytic activity of neutrophils against pathogenic organisms, improving the survivability percentage.

Dressing percentage and slaughter parameters

The findings showed non-significant difference in the dressing percentage of groups fed diets containing different levels of WDS. Our findings were supported by Kahraman et al. (1997) who also reported non-significant difference in the dressing percentage. Contrary to these findings, Khan (2001) mentioned that dressing percentage was significantly improved in broilers fed diets containing 6% sun dried RDS.
Significant increase in the liver weights was observed with decreasing the WDS level and increasing the canola meal in the diet. The probable reason for this might be either the presence of aflatoxin in the feedstuffs or the presence of allyl-isothiocyanates in the canola meal, both result in liver hyperplasia and as a result of that its weight increases. Liver hyperplasia was not observed in birds fed diets with higher levels of WDS and lower level of canola meal. In such diets allyl-isothiocyanate level was low and mycotoxins (if present) were bound by the oligomonosaccharides, present in WDS. Thus there was significant decrease in the liver weights. Our findings were supported by other researchers (Kinal et al., 1983; Idress, 1998) who reported that the increase in liver weight in broilers fed diets containing higher levels of canola meal, was probably due to a hydrolytic product of glucosinolates (allyl-isothiocyanate) which is present in canola meal and is toxic in nature like other thionamides, resulting in hyperplasia of the liver. Tripathi and Mishra (2008) reported similar findings.
Decreased pancreas weight with increasing the level of WDS might be due to the presence of various digestive enzymes in the distillery sludge. Other researcher (Pettersson and Aman, 1989; Brenes et al., 1993; Viveros et al., 1994; Berwal et al., 2008) also reported that increase in the digestibility of nutrients in the presence of enzymes in the feed can cause a reduction in the weight of pancreas.
Significant increase in the intestinal length was observed as the level of WDS was decreased in the diet. Possibly, this was related with modification in the intestinal length to accommodate higher fiber content/absence of enzymes in diets, not containing WDS. Similar findings were also reported by other researchers (Hetland and Svihus, 2001; Hetland et al., 2002, 2003). As the level of WDS was increased in the diet, it resulted in significant reduction in the intestinal length due to decreased fiber content and increased level of digestive enzymes, as WDS is a good source of digestive enzymes. Presence of enzymes in the feed can cause a reduction in the digestive tract size (Pettersson and Aman, 1989; Berwal et al., 2008).

CONCLUSION

Feeding increasing levels of distillery yeast sludge in the broiler diets resulted in improved weight gain and feed intake. However, inclusion of distillery yeast sludge up to 8% showed better results in terms of weight gain and economics. It resulted in significant reduction in the intestinal length and pancreas weight due to decreased fiber content and increased digestive enzymes, as WDS is a good source of digestive enzymes. Dressing percentage remained unaffected by feeding sludge in the diet. This indicates that distillery yeast sludge can be included in the poultry diet up to 8% without any deleterious effect on the performance of the birds.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was completed at the Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology (University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan). The authors thank Mr. Jamal, Crescent Sugar Mill and Laboratory staff of the Institute for their cooperation in this study.

Table 1
Nutrient composition of raw and washed distillery sludge
Nutrient (%) Distillery sludge Percent increase or decrease as a result of washing

Raw Washed
Proximate composition
 Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) 2,200 b±20 2,375 a ±23.02 ↑7.95
 Crude protein 27.40 b±0.15 34.80 a±0.20 ↑27.0
 True protein 18.10 b±0.10 28.20 a±0.13 ↑55.8
 Ether extract 1.10 b±0.2 1.20 a±0.02 ↑9.09
 Crude fiber 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Ash 22.08 a±0.31 11.88 b±0.19 ↓46.19
 Acid soluble ash 20.10 a±0.27 7.91 b±0.17 ↓60.64
 Nitrogen free extract 49.52±0.19 52.22 a ±0.07 ↑5.45
Mineral contents
 Calcium 3.440 a±0.02 1.330 b±0.001 ↓61.33
 Phosphorus 1.220 a±0.01 0.550 b±0.01 ↓54.91
 Potassium 3.520 a±0.02 1.293 b±0.02 ↓63.26
 Sodium 1.142 a±0.02 0.571 b±0.01 ↓50.0
 Magnesium 2.000 a±0.01 1.200 b±0.01 ↓40.0
 Manganese 0.010 a±0.01 0.004 b±0.01 ↓60.0
 Iron 0.194 a±0.01 0.107 b±0.01 ↓44.84
 Zinc 0.010 a±0.00 0.008 b±0.00 ↓20.0
 Copper 0.045 a±0.00 0.033 b±0.00 ↓26.66
 Cobalt 0.003 a±0.0 0.002 b±0.0 ↓33.33
 Chromium 0.011±0.001 0.010±0.001 ↓9.09

Means in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.01).

Table 2
Amino acid profile of raw and washed distillery sludge
Amino acid profile (%) Distillery sludge Percent increase or decrease as a result of washing

Raw Washed
Lysine 0.435 b±0.00 0.549 a±0.00 ↑26.20
Methionine 0.542 b±0.00 0.689 a±0.00 ↑27.12
Threonine 0.827 b±0.01 1.047 a±0.01 ↑26.60
Arginine 1.465 b±0.01 1.861 a±0.01 ↑27.03
Leucine 1.183 b±0.01 1.503 a±0.01 ↑27.04
Isoleucine 1.019 b±0.01 1.294 a±0.01 ↑26.98
Valine 0.989 b±0.01 1.252 a±0.01 ↑26.59
Phenylalanine 0.912 b±0.01 1.158 a±0.01 ↑26.97
Histidine 0.504 b±0.00 0.640 a±0.00 ↑26.98
Tyrosine 0.537 b±0.00 0.685 a±0.00 ↑27.56
Cystine 1.016 b±0.01 1.291 a±0.01 ↑27.06
Proline 0.619 b±0.01 0.786 a±0.01 ↑26.97
Glutamate 4.553 b±0.01 5.776 a±0.01 ↑26.86
Serine 0.589 b±0.01 0.751 a±0.01 ↑27.50
Aspartate 1.726 b±0.01 2.192 a±0.01 ↑26.99

Means in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.01).

Table 3
Percent ingredients and nutrient composition of broiler starter diets (0–4 wk)
Ingredient WDS1 (%)

0 4 8 12
Canola meal 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00
Washed distillery sludge 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00
Maize 38.40 39.30 40.15 40.90
Rice polishing 15.25 15.00 14.75 14.50
Maize gluten meal 60% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Soyabean meal 13.70 13.60 13.50 13.40
Cotton seed meal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Fish meal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Berga fat 3.55 3.10 2.70 2.40
Limestone 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90
Dicalcium phosphate 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
Vitamin mineral premix 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Chemical composition %
 Metabolizable energy kcal/kg 3,009 3,003 3,000 3,002
 Crude protein 21.91 21.92 21.92 21.91
 Crude fiber 5.08 4.88 4.64 4.40
 Ether extract 8.12 7.57 7.02 6.47
 Calcium 1.04 1.00 1.01 1.03
 Available phosphorus 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.45
 Lysine 1.10 1.00 0.91 0.81
 Methionine 0.50 0.49 0.47 0.45

1 0, 4, 8 and 12 WDS indicates percent inclusion of washed distillery sludge in the diets.

Table 4
Percent ingredients and nutrient composition of broiler finisher diets (5–6 wk)
Ingredient WDS1 (%)

0 4 8 12
Canola meal 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00
Washed distillery sludge 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00
Maize 45.80 46.25 46.60 47.10
Rice polishing 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00
Maize gluten meal 60% 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Soyabean meal 7.50 7.40 7.30 7.25
Cotton seed meal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Fish meal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Berga fat 1.85 1.60 1.45 1.10
Limestone 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90
Dicalcium phosphate 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Vitamin mineral premix 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Chemical composition (%)
 Metabolizable energy kcal/kg 3,003 3,007 3,015 3,014
 Crude protein 19.89 19.89 19.87 19.89
 Crude fiber 4.98 4.76 4.52 4.29
 Ether extract 6.81 6.59 5.77 5.26
 Calcium 0.93 0.91 0.92 0.91
 Available phosphorus 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.41
 Lysine 1.01 0.90 0.81 0.71
 Methionine 0.40 0.39 0.36 0.35

1 0, 4, 8 and 12 WDS indicates percent inclusion of washed distillery sludge in the diets.

Table 5
Effects of different levels of washed distillery sludge on body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, survival percentage and cost (US $) per kg weight gain in broiler chickens
Item WDS1 (%)

0 4 8 12
0–4 wk
 Weight gain (g/bird) 910b±7.52 943ab±20.56 978a±34.99 969a±6.87
 Feed intake (g/bird) 1,398b±29.88 1,444ab±43.64 1,476a±39.52 1,503a±0.60
 FCR 1.54±0.02 1.53±0.01 1.51±0.01 1.55±0.01
 Survivability (%) 100±0.00 100±0.00 100±0.00 100±0.00
 Cost ($) per kg weight gain 0.44a±0.24 0.42b±0.15 0.40c±0.16 0.40c±0.11
5–6 wk
 Weight gain (g/bird) 560c±10.0 562c±8.75 719a±11.45 650b±3.45
 Feed intake (g/bird) 1,366c±35.74 1380c±26.56 1,729a±4.01 1,545b±6.01
 FCR 2.44±0.02 2.46±0.01 2.40±0.04 2.38±0.02
 Survivability (%) 90.00±0.00 93.33±5.77 96.66±5.77 100.0±0.00
 Cost ($) per kg weight gain 0.80a±2.17 0.70b±3.35 0.60bc±1.31 0.56c±0.20
0–6 wk
 Weight gain (g/bird) 1,470c±15.66 1505c±24.87 1,697a±36.05 1,619b±6.03
 Feed intake (g/bird) 2,764c±59.96 2824c±63.27 3,205a±40.31 3,048b±6.61
 FCR 1.88±0.02 1.88±0.01 1.89±0.02 1.88±0.01
 Survivability (%) 90.00±0.00 93.33±5.77 96.66±5.77 100.0±0.00
 Cost ($) per kg weight gain 0.62a±1.12 0.56b±1.71 0.50c±0.61 0.48c±0.10

1 0, 4, 8 and 12 WDS indicates percent inclusion of washed distillery sludge in the diets.

Means in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.01).

Table 6
Effects of different levels of washed distillery sludge on the dressing percentage and slaughter parameters of broiler chickens
Item WDS1 (%)

0 4 8 12
Dressing percentage 65.78±1.81 65.13±2.13 65.89±2.42 66.20±1.53
Slaughter parameters (per 100 g)
 Heart weight (mg) 444.60a±18.23 401.90b±21.76 366.00b±20.36 376.60b±21.33
 Liver weight (g) 2.40a±0.04 2.26b±0.04 2.13c±0.09 2.16bc±0.07
 Gizzard weight (g) 1.67b±0.03 1.96a±0.10 2.10a±0.05 1.75b±0.10
 Intestinal length (cm) 11.13a±0.43 11.05a±0.32 9.86b±0.18 10.75a±0.26
 Pancreas weight (mg) 360.30a±25.17 335.40a±24.34 335.00a±23.96 289.70b±13.55
 Thymus weight (mg) 589.50±32.08 532.96±42.44 503.69±18.07 541.10±33.18

1 0, 4, 8 and 12 WDS indicates percent inclusion of washed distillery sludge in the diets.

Means in a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.01).

REFERENCES

Ali S. 2004. Lysine enrichment of distillery sludge, its biological evaluation and detoxification potential against aflatoxin B1. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. Chem. University of Agriculture; Faisalabad, Pakistan:

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ednAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists; Arlington, Virginia, USA:

Berwal RS, Lohan OP, Shiag Zile S. 2008. Effect of dietary crude fibre levels and enzyme supplementation on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Indian J Poult Sci 43:5529

Brenes A, Smith M, Guenter W, Marqurdt RR. 1993. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the performance and digestive tract size of broiler chickens fed wheat and barley based diets. Poult Sci 72:1731–1739.
crossref pmid
Bustamante MA, Moral R, Paredes C, Perez-Espinosa A, Moreno-Caselles J, Perez-Murcia MD. 2008. Agrochemical characterization of the solid by-products and residues from the winery and distillery industry. Waste Manag 28:372–380.
crossref pmid
Churchil R, Mohan B. 2000. Effect of supplementation of broiler diets with live yeast culure. Cheiron 29:23–27.

Economic Survey of Pakistan 2009–2010. Govt. of Pakistan. Finance Division, Economic Advisor’s Wing; Islamabad:

Esonu BO, Ogbonna UD, Anyanwu GA, Emenalom OO, Uchegbu MC, Etuk EB, Udedibie ABI. 2006. Evaluation of performance, organ characteristics and economic analysis of broiler finisher fed dried rumen digesta. Int J Poult Sci 5:1116–1118.
crossref
Goto I, Masuda Y, Senuki M. 1974. Utilization of brewers activated sludge for animal feed. 1. Digestibility as poultry feed and effect of growth of chickens. p. 115–118. Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agri. Kyushu University; Japan:

Haldar S, Ghosh TK, Toshiwati , Bedford MR. 2011. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and yeast protein concentrate on production performance of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress and challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 168:61–71.
crossref
Herria JA, Garcia A. 1983. Substitution of levels of soyabean meal by wheat (A) in diet for broilers fed 20% torrula yeast. Cuban J Agric Sci 17:299–306.

Hetland H, Svihus B. 2001. Effect of oat hulls on performance, gut capacity and feed passage time in broiler chicken. Br Poult Sci 42:354–361.
crossref pmid
Hetland H, Svilus B, Olaisen V. 2002. Effect of feeding whole cereals on performance, starch digestibility and duodenal particle size distribution in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 43:416–423.
crossref pmid
Hetland H, Svilus B, Krogdahl A. 2003. Effect of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. Br Poult Sci 44:275–282.
crossref pmid
Idrees Z. 1998. Use of different levels of canola meal in broiler diets as a replacement of soyabean meal. M.Sc. (Hons.) Thesis. University of Agriculture; Faisalabad, Pakistan:

Kahraman R, Abas I, Bostan K, Tanor A, Kocabagli N, Alp M. 1997. Effect of organic acids and yeast culture on performance, ileum pH and enterobacteriaceae population of broiler. Pendik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 28:171–180.

Khan ML. 2001. Poultry feeds and nutrition. Kitabistan Publishing Co; 38-Urdu Bazar, Lahore:

Kinal S, Kroliczek A, Gawara T, Arciszewska R. 1983. Effect of Janpol rapeseed on digestibility of nutrients and production indices of broiler chicken. Nutr Abstr Rev 53:2731

Machalek E, Hudskey Z, Dostalova D, Cibulka JC. 1988. The use of yeast protein vitex in fattening broiler chickens. Zivocisna Vyroba 33:1037–1046.

Magalhaes VJA, Susca F, Lima FS, Branco AF, Yoon I, Santos JEP. 2008. Effect of feeding yeast culture on performance, health, and immunocompetence of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 91:1497–1509.
crossref pmid
Murphy EA, Davis JM, Brown AS, Carmichael MD, Ghaffar A, Mayer EP. 2007. Oat β-glucan effects on neutrophil respiratory burst activity following exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:639–644.
crossref pmid
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 11th revised edNational Academy Press; Washington, DC, USA:

Nilson A, Peralta JMF, Miazzo RD. 2004. Use of brewers yeast (S. cerevisiae) to replace part of the vitamin mineral premix in finisher broiler diets. In : XXII Worlds Poultry Congress; Istanbul, Turkey.

Nukamp HJ. 1965. Some remarks about the determination of the heat if combustion and the carbon content of urine. Fida EAAP, Publ; 11th edBlaxter, KL: Academic Press.

Oliva-Teles A, Goncalves P. 2001. Partial replacement of fish meal by brewers yeast Saccaromyces cerevisae in diets for sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax juveniles. Aquaculture 202:269–278.
crossref
Paryad A, Mahmoudi M. 2008. Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Afr J Agric Res 3:835–842.

Pelícia VC, Sartori JR, Zavarize KC, Pezzato AC, Stradiotti AC, Araujo PC, Mituo MAO, Madeira LA. 2010. Effect of nucleotides on broiler performance and carcass yield. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 12:31–34.
crossref
Pettersson D, Aman P. 1989. Enzyme supplementation of poultry diets containing rye and wheat. Br J Nutr 62:139–149.
crossref pmid
Rameshwari KS, Karthikeyan S. 2005. Distillery yeast sludge (DYS) as an alternative feed resource in poultry. Int J Poult Sci 4:787–789.
crossref
Rumsey GL, Kinsella JE, Shetty KJ, Hughes SG. 1991. Effect of high dietary concentdiets of brewers dried yeast on growth performance and liver uricase in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Anim Feed Sci Technol 33:177–183.
crossref
Gomez S, de L Angeles M. 2011. Effect of an enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast and yeast culture combined with flavomycin and monensin on finishing broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci 10:433–439.
crossref
Santin E, Maiorka A, Macari M, Grecco M, Sanchezi JC, Okada TM, Myasaka AM. 2001. Performance and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chickens fed diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J Appl Poult Res 10:236–244.
crossref
Shahzad MA, Rajoka M. 2011. Single cell protein production from Aspergillus terreus and its evaluation in broiler chicks. Int J Biosci Biochem Bioinform 1:137–141.

Silva VK, Della J, da Silva Torre, Torres KAA, de Faria Filho D, Hirota Hada F, Barbosa de Moraes VM. 2009. Humoral immune response of broilers fed diets containing yeast extract and prebiotics in the prestarter phase and raised at different temperatures. J Appl Poult Res 18:530–540.
crossref
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometric Approach. 3rd edMcGraw-Hill; Boston:

Teeter R. 1992. Effect of yeast culture in broilers under heat stress and non-specific antigen challenge yeast culture poultry research report. Deptt. Animal Science, Oklahoma State University; Stillwater, Oklahoma:

Tovar D, Zambonino J, Cahu C, Gatesoupe FJ, Vazquez-Juarez R, Le sel R. 2002. Effect of live yeast incorpodiet in compound diet on digestive enzyme activity in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture 204:113–123.
crossref
Tripathi MK, Mishra AS. 2008. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition. A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 132:1–27.
crossref
Viveros A, Brenes A, Pizarro M, Castano M. 1994. Effect of enzyme supplementation of a diet based on barley and autoclave treatment, on apparent digestibility, growth performance and gut morphology of broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48:237–251.
crossref
Ware SA. 1977. Single cell protein and other food recovery technologies from waste. Municipal environmental research laboratory. Office of R. & D. U.S. E.P.A; Cincinnati, Ohio:

Yalcın S, Erol H, Zsoy BO, Onbasılar I, Yalcın S. 2008. Effects of the usage of dried brewing yeast in the diets on the performance, egg traits and blood parameters in quails. Animal 2:1780–1785.
crossref pmid
Zerai DB, Fitzsimmons KM, Collier RJ, Duff GC. 2008. Evaluation of brewer’s waste as partial replacement of fish meal protein in nile tilapia, oreochromis niloticus, diets. J World Aquac Soc 39:556–564.
crossref
Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee KW, An GH, Song KB, Lee CH. 2005. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. J Poult Sci 84:1015–1021.
crossref


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next