Immobilization of the Antarctic <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. LX-1 α-Galactosidase on Eudragit L-100 for the Production of a Functional Feed Additive

Jaekoo Lee; Inkyung Park; Jaiesoon Cho

doi:10.5713/ajas.2012.12557

Lee, Park, and Cho: Immobilization of the Antarctic Bacillus sp. LX-1 α-Galactosidase on Eudragit L-100 for the Production of a Functional Feed Additive

Article

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) 2013; 26(4): 552-557.

https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12557

Immobilization of the Antarctic Bacillus sp. LX-1 α-Galactosidase on Eudragit L-100 for the Production of a Functional Feed Additive

Jaekoo Lee^a, Inkyung Park^a, Jaiesoon Cho^*

Department of Animal Sciences and Environment, College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea

^*Corresponding Author: Jaiesoon Cho.
Tel: +82-2-450-3375, Fax: +82-2-455-1044, E-mail: chojs70@konkuk.ac.kr

^a These authors equally contributed to this work.

Received October 09, 2012 Accepted December 02, 2012 Revised December 11, 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Partially purified α-galactosidase from Bacillus sp. LX-1 was non-covalently immobilized on a reversibly soluble-insoluble polymer, Eudragit L-100, and an immobilization efficiency of 0.93 was obtained. The optimum pH of the free and immobilized enzyme was 6.5 to 7.0 and 7.0, respectively, while there was no change in optimum temperature between the free and immobilized α-galactosidase. The immobilized α-galactosidase was reutilized six times without significant loss in activity. The immobilized enzyme showed good storage stability at 37°C, retaining about 50% of its initial activity even after 18 d at this temperature, while the free enzyme was completely inactivated. The immobilization of α-galactosidase from Bacillus sp. LX-1 on Eudragit L-100 may be a promising strategy for removal of α-galacto-oligosaccharides such as raffinose and stachyose from soybean meal and other legume in feed industry.

Keywords: α-Galactosidase; Bacillus; Eudragit L-100; Immobilization; α-Galacto-oligosaccharides; Feed Industry

INTRODUCTION

Soybean is a legume crop and a premier protein source of foods and feeds globally, owing to its well-balanced amino acid pattern (Thippeswamy and Mulimani, 2002; Stein et al., 2008). Nevertheless, the use of soybean-based foods or feeds has been occasionally restricted because they contain α-galacto-oligosaccharides such as raffinose and stachyose, which act as anti-nutritive factors (De Lumen, 1992; Anderson and Wolf, 1995; Prashanth and Mulimani, 2005). Monogastric animals including human, swine, and poultry cannot synthesize sufficient α-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) in their gastrointestinal tracts (Karr-Lilienthal et al., 2005; Prashanth and Mulimani, 2005), which is an exo-glycosidase catalyzing the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing α-1,6-linked galactosyl residues from a wide range of galacto-oligosaccharides and polysaccharides (Naumoff, 2004). Thus, the α-galacto-oligosaccharides pass into the large intestine, where the resident microbita ferment them into carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and methane, which lead to flatulence and gastrointestinal disorder (Steggerda et al., 1966; Prashanth and Mulimani, 2005). Accordingly, degradation of the oligosaccharides from the soybean-based products by α-galactosidase could be an efficacious tool to solve the nutritional problem (Ghazi et al., 2003; Gote et al., 2004; Falkoski et al., 2009).

Considerable attention has been paid to immobilized enzymes, because of their favorable features such as reusability, stability, and separation of the enzymes from products, compared to free counterparts (Falkoski et al., 2009). Particularly, concerning animal nutrition and feed science, the immobilization technique has been applied in developing a kit for measuring in vitro amino acid digestibility of soybean meal, which could be correlated to poultry true amino acid digestibility (Schasteen et al., 2007) and in preparing a forage additive (Monica et al., 2008). Up to now, several matrices including polyacrylamide, alginate, chitin, silica gel, Amberlite IRA-938, and Sepabeads EC have been used as support materials for preparing immobilized α-galactosidases (Onal and Telefoncu, 2003a,b; Prashanth and Mulimani, 2005; Falkoski et al., 2009; Bayraktar et al., 2011). Additionally, there is much interest in Eudragit L-100 (a copolymer of methacrylic acid and methylmethacrylate) which was utilized as a reversibly soluble and insoluble immobilization matrix for immobilization of the widely used technological enzymes such as xylanase (Sardar et al., 2000; Gaur et al., 2005), cellulase (Zhang et al., 2010), and amylase (Cong et al., 1995), as well as a pH-dependent enteric coating polymer for the efficacious colon-specific drug delivery system (Venkatesh et al., 2009).

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first report on the immobilization of α-galactosidase on Eudragit L-100. The α-galactosidase was derived from an Antarctic bacterial isolate, Bacillus LX-1 as previously described (Lee et al., 2012).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

Eudragit L-100, which is a copolymer of methacrylic acid and methylmethacrylate at a ratio of 1:1, was a product of Rohm Pharma, Weiterstadt, Germany. The substrate, p-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (pNPG) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Preparation of free α-galactosidase

Bacillus sp. LX-1 was cultivated in 25 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented by containing 1% galactose in an Erlenmeyer flask of 250 ml capacity for 24 h at 28°C. Then, 1 L of the same medium in two Erlenmeyer flasks of 2 L capacity was aseptically inoculated with 1% seed culture broth and aerobically grown with vigorous shaking (220 rpm) for 48 h at 28°C. The culture medium containing secreted α-galactosidase was centrifuged (10,000×g; 20 min; 4°C) to remove cell, and then protein in the supernatant was precipitated with ammonium sulfate (75% saturation). The pellet was dissolved in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and dialyzed overnight against 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 4°C. The dialyzed solution was used as the free enzyme throughout this work.

Immobilization of α-galactosidase on Eudragit L-100

2% Eudragit L-100 solution was prepared as previously described (Roy et al., 2003). The free enzyme (0.1 to 2 ml) was added to 0.75 ml of the Eudragit L-100 solution and the final volume was made up to 5 ml with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0). After 1 h incubation at room temperature, polymer was precipitated by lowering pH to 4.0 with 3 M acetic acid. After 20 min, the suspension was spun down by centrifugation (12,000×g, 20 min). The precipitate was washed with 4 ml of 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.0) until no enzyme activity was detected in the washings. Finally, the pellet so formed was suspended in 5 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) and used as the immobilized enzyme preparation.

Enzyme activity assay

The α-galactosidase activity was determined by the amount of p-nitrophenol released from the pNPG. The reaction mixture (1 ml) containing 0.1 ml of diluted soluble enzyme (free or immobilized), 0.8 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0 ) and 0.1 ml of 10 mM pNPG in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) was incubated at 40°C for 15 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 ml of 1 M Na₂CO₃. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per minute under the assay conditions.

Reusability of the immobilized enzyme

The immobilized α-galactosidase was used for repeated cycles to check its reusability. The preparation was incubated at 40°C with 1 mM pNPG in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) for 15 min. After each cycle of hydrolysis, the pH of the supernatant was lowered to 4.0 by adding 0.2 ml of 3 M acetic acid when the immobilized enzyme was precipitated. This was collected by centrifugation (12,000×g, 30 min) and the amount of released p-nitrophenol in supernatant estimated according to the analytical method described above. For running the second cycle, the immobilized enzyme was redissolved in 5 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) and added to the pNPG and processed the same way as before.

Determination of pH optimum

The effects of optimum pH on the free and immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase were investigated by assaying both preparations in the pH range of 3 to 8.5 (50 mM glycine-HCl (pH 3); 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 4 to 5.5); 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6 to 7) and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4 to 8.5)) at 30°C.

Determination of optimum temperature

The effects of optimum temperature on the free and immobilized enzyme were determined by assaying their activities at different temperatures (0 to 80°C) in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0).

Determination of shelf storage stability

For testing the shelf storage stability of enzymes, both free and immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase were stored at 37°C for 18 d. Then the remaining activity of the enzymes was measured under the standard assay conditions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Immobilization of LX-1 α-galactosidase

LX-1 α-galactosidase was immobilized on the smart polymer, Eudragit L-100, which is a relatively cheap, easily available, non-toxic, and water soluble support, and which binds non-covalently to proteins (Gaur et al., 2005). The optimal immobilization efficiency of 0.93 was achieved at 0.77 U of enzyme load and, beyond the amount of enzyme, the immobilization efficiency tended to decrease (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicted the activity staining of the immobilized enzyme. The decrease of immobilization efficiency with larger enzyme load is generally caused by overcrowding of the enzyme on the Eudragit surface (Sardar et al., 2000; Roy et al., 2003). Meanwhile, only 0.55 of the optimal immobilization efficiency was observed when α-galactosidase from Penicillium griseoroseum was immobilized onto modified silica gel using glutaldehyde linkages (Falkoski et al., 2009). Thus, the immobilization yield of LX-1 α-galactosidase seemed to be acceptable.

Reusability of immobilized enzyme

As an immobilization matrix, the merit of Eudragit L-100 is its solubility during catalysis with its insolubility below pH 4.0, enabling catalyst recovery and separation of the soluble reaction products by lowering the pH (Roy et al., 2003; Gaur et al., 2005). Reusability of an immobilized enzyme is of great importance for economical use of the enzyme in repeated batch or continuous processes (Bayraktar et al., 2011). As shown in Figure 3, the immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase could be recycled for six times without significant loss in activity, despite the fact that the enzyme was recovered by lowering the pH to 4.0 after each cycle. Such acidic process for enzyme recovery, which has routinely used in other enzymes immobilized on Eudragit matrices (Gaur et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010) did not have any negative effect on the LX-1 α-galactosidase activity. This may be somewhat associated with previous report that immobilization of Aspergillus niger xylanase on Eudragit L-100 has led to stabilization of the enzyme toward alternate exposure to pH 4.0 and pH 5.5 (Sardar et al., 2000).

Effect of pH on activity of free and immobilized enzyme

As shown in Figure 4, the optimum pH values for the free and immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase were 6.5 to 7.0 and 7.0, respectively. Although the pH profile change in immobilized enzymes was very common (Thippeswamy and Mulimani, 2002; Bora et al., 2005; Sanjay and Sugunan, 2005), immobilization of enzymes on the reversibly soluble-insoluble polymers such as Eudragit L-100 and Eudragit S-100 had frequently marginal effect on the optimal pH activities (Ai et al., 2005). For instance, there were no and slight changes in the optimum pH values for Aspergillus niger and Scytalidium thermophilum xylanase immobilized on Eudragit L-100, respectively (Sardar et al., 2000; Gaur et al., 2005). In addition, the optimum pH value of tomato α-galactosidase immobilized on galactose-containing polymeric beads and the free enzyme was identically pH 4.0 (Okutucu et al., 2010).

Effect of temperature on activity of free and immobilized enzyme

The optimum temperature for the free and immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase was 40°C (Figure 5). Immobilization had no influence on the optimum temperature of the enzyme, which was also observed in a commercial protease, Esperase, immobilized on Eudragit S-100 (Silva et al., 2006), the Penicillium griseoroseum α-galactosidase immobilized on silica gel (Falkoski et al., 2009) and the tomato α-galactosidase immobilized on galactose-containing polymeric beads (Okutucu et al., 2010). However, the optimum temperature of the Streptomyces olivaceoviridis E-86 xylanase immobilized on Eudragit S-100 moved from 60°C (the optimum temperature of free enzyme) to 65°C (Ai et al., 2005).

Storage shelf stability of free and immobilized enzymes

In general, an enzyme in solution is not stable during storage and the activity is gradually decreased over time (Bayraktar et al., 2011). From a practical point of view, it is an important criterion that an enzyme designed for use in animal feed should survive storage at ambient temperature (Francesch and Perez-Vendrell, 1997; Sulabo et al., 2011). As shown in Figure 6, the storage stability at 37°C was greatly improved by immobilization. The immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase retained about 50% of its initial activity even after 18 d at this temperature, while the free enzyme was completely inactivated. The improved stability of immobilized enzymes may be associated with the prevention of autolysis (Sharma et al., 2003). In addition, the storage stability of immobilized enzymes varies depending on the applied immobilization method and storage conditions (Onal and Telefoncu, 2003b; Celem and Onal, 2009; Okutucu et al., 2010).

CONCLUSIONS

Nowadays, advanced feed production can rely on biotechnological approaches. The immobilization of α-galactosidase from Bacillus sp. LX-1 on Eudragit L-100 may be a promising strategy for removal of α-galacto-oligosaccharides such as raffinose and stachyose from soybean meal and other legume in feed industry, which enables to increase the available energy and feed efficiency (Suarez et al., 1999; Vila and Mascarell, 1999), due to its relatively durable enzyme activity and good storage stability.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by Bio-industry Technology Development Program, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Korea.

Figure 1.

Immobilization of LX-1 α-galactosidase on Eudragit L-100. “A” represents the amount of enzyme theoretically bound to the matrix. This is calculated by subtracting the unbound activity in the supernatant from initially added enzyme. “B” represents the expressed activity of the particular immobilized preparation, measured after incubating the immobilized enzyme with the substrate. Data were expressed as mean±standard error from three experiments.

Figure 2.

Zymogram analysis of α-galactosidase activity in the immobilized enzyme.

Figure 3.

Reusability of the immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase. Data were expressed as mean±standard error from three experiments.

Figure 4.

Effect of pH on LX-1 α-galactosidase activity. Data were expressed as mean±standard error from three experiments. Immobilized enzyme (open circle with dotted line); free enzyme (closed circle with solid line).

Figure 5.

Effect of temperature on LX-1 α-galactosidase activity. Data were expressed as mean±standard error from three experiments. Immobilized enzyme (open circle with dotted line); free enzyme (closed circle with solid line).

Figure 6.

Storage stability of free and immobilized LX-1 α-galactosidase at 37°C. Data were expressed as mean±standard error from three experiments. Immobilized enzyme (open circle with dotted line); free enzyme (closed circle with solid line).

REFERENCES

Ai Z, Jiang Z, Li L, Deng W, Kusakabe I, Li H. 2005. Immobilization of Streptomyces olivaceoviridis E-86 xylanase on Eudragit S-100 for xylo-oligosaccharide production. Process Biochem 40:2707–2714.

Anderson RL, Wolf WJ. 1995. Compositional changes in trypsin inhibitors, phytic acid, saponins and isoflavones related to soybean processing. J Nutr 125:581S–588S.

Bayraktar H, Serilmez M, Karkas T, Celem EB, Onal S. 2011. Immobilization and stabilization of α-galactosidase on Sepabeads EC-EA and EC-HA. Int J Biol Macromol 49:855–860.

Bora U, Kannan K, Nahar P. 2005. A simple method for functionalization of cellulose membrane for covalent immobilization of biomolecules. J Membr Sci 250:215–222.

Celem EB, Onal S. 2009. Immobilization of phytase on epoxy-activated Sepabead EC-EP for the hydrolysis of soymilk phytate. J Mol Cat B: Enzym 61:150–156.

Cong L, Kaul R, Dissing U, Mattiasson B. 1995. A model study on Eudragit and polyethyleneimine as soluble carriers of α-amylase for repeated hydrolysis of starch. J Biotechnol 42:75–84.

De Lumen OB. 1992. Molecular strategies to improve protein quality and reduce flatulence in legumes. Food Struct 11:33–46.

Falkoski DL, Guimaraes VM, de Queiroz MV, de Araujo EF, de Almeida MN, de Barros EG, de Rezende ST. 2009. Covalent immobilization of α-galactosidase from Penicillium griseoroseum and its application in oligosaccharides hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 158:540–551.

Francesch M, Perez-Vendrell AM. 1997. Recent studies on enzyme application in animal feeding. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes 26:149–159.

Gaur R, Lata , Khare SK. 2005. Immobilization of xylan-degrading enzymes from Scytalidium thermophilum on Eudragit L-100. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1123–1128.

Ghazi S, Rooke JA, Galbraith H. 2003. Improvement of the nutritive value of soybean meal by protease and α-galactosidase treatment in broiler cockerels and broiler chicks. Br Poult Sci 44:410–418.

Gote M, Umalkar H, Khan I, Khire J. 2004. Thermostable α-galactosidase from Bacillus stearothermophilus and its application in the removal of flatulence causing from soymilk. Process Biochem 39:1723–1729.

Karr-Lilienthal LK, Kadzere CT, Grieshop CM, Fahey GC. 2005. Chemical and nutritional properties of soybean carbohydrates as related to nonruminants: A review. Livest Prod Sci 97:1–12.

Lee J, Park I, Cho J. 2012. Production and partial characterization of α-galactosidase activity from an Antarctic bacterial isolate, Bacillus LX-1. Afr J Biotechnol 11:12396–12405.

Monica D, Vintila T, Beatrice VO, Gabriela P. 2008. Stabilization of microbial enzymatic preparations used in feed industry. Lucrari stiintifice Zootehnie si Biotehnologii 41:69–72.

Naumov DG. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of α-galactosidases of the GH27 family. Mol Biol (Mosk) 38:463–476.

Okutucu B, Celem EB, Onal S. 2010. Immobilization of α-galactosidase on galactose-containing polymeric beads. Enzyme Microb Technol 46:200–205.

Onal S, Telefoncu A. 2003a. Comparison of chitin and Amberlite IRA-938 for alpha-galactosidase immobilization. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 31:19–33.

Onal S, Telefoncu A. 2003b. Preparation and properties of α-galactosidase chemically attached to activated chitin. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 31:339–355.

Prashanth SJ, Mulimani VH. 2005. Soymilk oligosaccharide hydrolysis by Aspergillus oryzae α-galactosidase immobilized in calcium alginate. Process Biochem 40:1199–1205.

Roy I, Gupta A, Khare SK, Bisaria VS, Gupta MN. 2003. Immobilization of xylan-degrading enzymes from Melanocarpus albomyces IIS 68 on the smart polymer Eudragit L-100. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:309–313.

Sanjay G, Sugunan S. 2005. Immobilization of α–amylase onto K-10 montmorillonite: characterization and comparison of activity in a batch and a fixed-bed reactor. Clay Minerals 40:499–510.

Sardar M, Roy I, Gupta M. 2000. Simultaneous purification and immobilization of Aspergillus niger xylanase on the reversibly soluble polymer Eudragit^™ L-100. Enzyme Microb Technol 27:672–679.

Schasteen CS, Wu J, Schulz MG, Parsons CM. 2007. Correlation of an immobilized digestive enzyme assay with poultry true amino acid digestibility for soybean meal. Poult Sci 86:343–348.

Sharma S, Kaur P, Jain A, Rajeswari MR, Gupta MN. 2003. A smart bioconjugate of chymotrypsin. Biomacromolecules 4:330–336.

Silva CJSM, Zhang Q, Shen J, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2006. Immobilization of proteases with a water soluble-insoluble reversible polymer for treatment of wool. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:634–640.

Steggerda FR, Richard EA, Rackis JJ. 1966. Effect of various soybean products on flatulence in the adult man. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 121:1235–1239.

Stein HH, Berger LL, Drackley JK, Fahey GC, Hernot DC, Parsons CM. 2008. Nutritional properties and feeding values of soybeans and their coproducts. Soybeans, Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization. Johnson A, White PJ, Galloway R, editorsAOCS Press; Urbana, IL, USA: p. 613–660.

Suarez FL, Springfield J, Furne JK, Lohrmann TT, Kerr PS, Levitt MD. 1999. Gas production in humans ingesting a soybean meal derived from beans naturally low in oligosaccharides. Am J Clin Nutr 69:135–139.

Sulabo RC, Jones CK, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Dritz SS, Campbell DR, Ratliff BW, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL. 2011. Factors affecting storage stability of various commercial phytase sources. J Anim Sci 89:4262–4271.

Thippeswamy S, Mulimani VH. 2002. Enzymatic degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides in soymilk by immobilized α-galactosidase from Gibberella fujikuroi. Process Biochem 38:635–640.

Venkatesh DN, Reddy AK, Samanta MK, Suresh B. 2009. Development and in vitro evaluation of colonic drug delivery systems for tegaserod maleate. Asian J Pharmaceutics 3:50–53.

Vila B, Mascarell J. 1999. α-Galactosides in soybean meal: can enzyme help. Feed Inter 6:24–29.

Zhang Y, Xu J, Yuan Z, Xu H, Yu Q. 2010. Artificial neural network-genetic algorithm based optimization for the immobilization of cellulase on the smart polymer Eudragit L-100. Bioresour Technol 101:3153–3158.