Low-density Lipoprotein Improves Motility and Plasma Membrane Integrity of Cryopreserved Canine Epididymal Spermatozoa

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29(5):646-651
Publication date (electronic) : 2015 September 17
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0572
Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
1Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailland
2Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44000, Thailand
*Corresponding Author: S. Manee-in. Tel: +66-2-4415242, Fax: +66-2-4410937, E-mail: sukanya.man@mahidol.edu
Received 2015 July 06; Revised 2015 July 25; Accepted 2015 September 12.

Abstract

Cryopreservation of caudal epididymal spermatozoa is an effective technique to conserve genetic potentials of superior dogs when it is not possible to collect ejaculated spermatozoa. Although hen egg yolk is commonly supplemented into the semen extender, active substances within the egg yolk which protect sperm against cryoinjury remain to be discovered. Among its compositions, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been reported to have a cryoprotective property for sperm cryopreservation. However, the effects of LDL on dog epididymal spermatozoa during cryopreservation have not yet been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LDL on epididymal spermatozoa quality following cryopreservation and thawing. After routine castration of 12 dogs, caudal epididymides from individuals were separated from the testes and cut into a few pieces in a Tris-buffer. Spermatozoa recovered from each sample were examined at once for sperm quality and divided into six groups of extender: no LDL, 20% egg yolk, 4%, 8%, 16%, and 24% LDL, before cryopreservation. The sperm aliquots were then equilibrated and conventionally frozen. After thawing, sperm motility, morphology, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity were evaluated. The results revealed that 4% LDL and 20% egg yolk yielded significantly higher sperm motility (57.69% and 52.69%, respectively, p<0.05) than other LDLs. In addition, 4% LDL yielded the significantly highest plasma membrane integrity (70.54%, p<0.05). In conclusion, the supplementation of 4% LDL in Tris-glucose extender could be applied for cryopreservation of canine epididymal spermatozoa.

INTRODUCTION

Spermatozoa cryopreservation is a method for preserving genetic material and maintaining genetic diversity in several species, including dogs. This extends the storage time and facilitates semen transportation over distance. Although ejaculated spermatozoa have been successfully cryopreserved, this technique encountered a limited success with epididymal spermatozoa (Hewitt et al., 2001). This probably results from the difference in morphology, function, and membrane stability between epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa (England, 1993; Hewitt et al., 2001). Previous investigation in dogs demonstrated lower sperm motility, membrane integrity, and conception rate in post-thawed epididymal spermatozoa compared to ejaculated spermatozoa (Hori et al., 2004).

Since cryopreservation of epididymal spermatozoa is the technique of choice to preserve genetic potential of fertility-proven dogs when they unexpectedly die or fail to provide ejaculated sperm, it is, therefore, important to improve the freezing technique for sperm recovered from the caudal epididymis. In addition, it has been established that the composition of the semen extender plays a pivotal role in protecting sperm against cryoinjury which occurs during freezing and thawing processes (Hewitt et al., 2001).

Recent studies report that the sperm plasma membrane is the primary site of cryodamage during freezing and thawing due to changes in its lipid and protein structure (Gao and Critser, 2000). Egg yolk is frequently included in semen extenders because it provides long-term survival of spermatozoa during freeze-thaw process due to its protective effects against cold shock (Kampschmidt et al., 1953). A major components of egg yolk are low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) (Bencharif et al., 2008). LDL has been reported to have a cryoprotective effect, while HDL is disadvantageous for spermatozoa cryopreservation (Amirat et al., 2004). In bulls, spermatozoa cryopreserved with LDL-supplemented extender yielded 2 times higher motility than that with crude egg yolk semen extender (Moussa et al., 2002; Amirat et al., 2004). Similarly, LDL-based extender has been proven to enhance the cryopreservability of canine ejaculated spermatozoa (Varela Junior et al., 2009). Given that epididymal spermatozoa are more sensitive to cold stress than ejaculated spermatozoa, it is of interest to examine whether LDL-based extender protects epididymal spermatozoa against cryoinjury. This study aimed at investigating the effects of LDL-based semen extender on quality of epididymal spermatozoa following cryopreservation and thawing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The animal intervention was approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Science-Animal Care and Use Committee (FVS-ACUC), Mahidol University, protocol number MUVS-2010-16.

Experimental design

Canine spermatozoa were collected from caudal epididymides. Sperm motility, morphology, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity were evaluated immediately after sperm recovery. Sperm samples were centrifuged at 700×g for 6 min, the supernatant removed, and the sperm pellets diluted with 6 different Tris-glucose-based extenders: i) no LDL, ii) 20% egg yolk, iii) 4% LDL, iv) 8% LDL, v) 16% LDL, and vi) 24% LDL. The recovered spermatozoa were equilibrated in these primary semen extenders and then conventionally frozen. Sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosome integrity were evaluated at 0, 2, and 4 h after thawing.

Preparation of freezing medium

Freezing extender used in this study was prepared as followed: 2.4% (w/v) Tris (BDH, Leuven, Belgium), 1.4% citric acid (BDH, London, England), 0.8% glucose (Merck, Germany), 0.06% (w/v) sodium benzyl penicillin (M&H manufacturing co., Ltd., Samutprakarn, Thailand), 0.1% (w/v) streptomycin sulphate (M&H manufacturing co., Ltd., Thailand), and different concentrations of LDL (no LDL, 4%, 8%, 16%, 24% LDL) or 20% (v/v) egg yolk. These extenders were supplemented with 3% and 7% (v/v) glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for extender 1 and 2, respectively. Thawing medium used in this study was prepared according to Axner et al. (2004).

Low density lipoprotein preparation

The LDL was extracted from egg yolk according to the method essentially described by Moussa et al. (2002). Briefly, hen egg yolk was collected in a cooled beaker. Plasma fractionation was performed by diluting egg yolk twice with 0.17 M NaCl and stirred for 1 hour and were then twice centrifuged at 10,000×g for 45 min at 10°C. LDL were extracted by mixing the plasma with 40% ammonium sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 1 hour to precipitate livetins. The pH of the plasma was fixed at 8.7. Plasma was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 45 min at 4°C. Supernatant was dialyzed against distilled water for 6 hours to discard ammonium sulfate. After 6 hour, the solution was centrifuged at the same protocol. The floating LDL rich residue was obtained.

Animals and collection of epididymal spermatozoa

Epididymal spermatozoa were collected from 12 healthy dogs of various breeds that were routinely castrated, aged between 1 and 7 years old. Spermatozoa were collected from a pair of caudal epididymides from each dog. Caudal epididymides were cut into a few pieces and then placed in thawing medium for 10 min at 37°C (Tittarelli et al., 2006). After epididymal tissues were removed from that medium, spermatozoa suspensions from right and left caudal epididymides of individuals were pooled. The spermatozoa samples containing those having motility and normal morphology more than 70% were included in the experiment.

Spermatozoa cryopreservation and thawing

Spermatozoa cryopreservation was performed according to Manee-in et al. (2014). Briefly, the spermatozoa suspension was centrifuged at 700×g for 6 min; the spermatozoa pellet was then re-suspended in extender 1. After 1 h equilibration at 4°C, an equal volume of extender 2 was gently added (Axner et al., 2004). The spermatozoa suspension was loaded into a 0.5 mL straw and subsequently frozen by placing the straw horizontally 4 cm above liquid nitrogen vapors for 10 min. All straws were finally immersed in the liquid nitrogen (Andersen, 1975). Thawing procedure was performed by immersing the straw in warm water (37°C) for 15 seconds. The frozen-thawed spermatozoa suspension was then released into thawing medium for further investigations.

After the incubation in thawing medium at 37°C for 5 min, the sperm suspensions were evaluated for sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity at 0 h, 2 h, and 4 h, respectively.

Spermatozoa evaluation

Spermatozoa samples were assessed immediately after collecting and thawing. Spermatozoa motility and progressive motility (scale 0 to 5) was blind evaluated under a phase-contrast microscope at 200× (Platz and Seager, 1978). Head morphology was estimated under a light microscope at 1,000× by counting 500 spermatozoa after Williams staining. Thereafter, a 2 μL of semen sample was fixed with formal saline for evaluating tail morphology from 200 spermatozoa under a phase-contrast microscope at 1,000×. Plasma membrane and acrosome integrities were evaluated by staining the spermatozoa with Ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1, Molecular probes Inc., Eugene OR, USA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA, Sigma, USA), respectively. In brief, an aliquot of 5 μL sperm suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 2 μM EthD-1 for 10 min at 37°C. Subsequently, 5 μL of a 10 mg/mL salmon sperm DNA (Fluka, Munich, Germany) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added to bind excessive EthD-1 for 3 min at 37°C. Supernatant was removed after centrifugation at 300×g for 5 min. The spermatozoa were then smeared on a glass microscopic slide and fixed with 95% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s. Fixed spermatozoa were stained with 100 μg/mL FITC-PNA in PBS in a humidified chamber for 30 min at 4°C, rinsed with 4°C distilled water, and allowed to air dry at 4°C. The fluorescently labeled slides were kept in the dark until evaluation. In total, 200 spermatozoa per slide were randomly evaluated and classified into 3 categories as described by Cheng et al. (1996) using an epifluorescent microscope at 1,000×.

Statistical analysis

All data were manipulated and statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis Systems software (SAS for windows, version 9, Cary, NC, USA). Normal distribution of residuals from the statistical models was tested using Shapilo-Wilk test. An analysis of variance was performed under the general linear model procedure. The statistical models included the effect of groups of LDL concentration, time, and interaction between LDL concentration and duration after thawing. Least-squares means were calculated and compared using Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. All data were expressed as mean ±standard deviation. The level of significance was considered at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The characteristics of spermatozoa recovered from caudal epididymides (fresh spermatozoa) and after cryopreservation are shown in Tables 1 to 3. Motility, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity of post-thawed spermatozoa decreased over the time of examination. In fresh spermatozoa, an average percentage of normal head morphology, normal tail morphology, motility, progressive motility, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity were 82.77±6.25, 80.19±7.23, 80.77±4.94, 4.54±0.51, 74.88±5.86, and 55.50±16.67, respectively.

Spermatozoa motility (%) and progressive motility of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each experimental group (mean±SD)

Sperm acrosome integrity (%) of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each treatment and control (mean±SD)

Moreover, LDL dose-specific was observed: 4% LDL-based-extender yielded the highest percentage of post-thawed sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity (57.69±5.63, 70.54±12.84, and 46.58± 10.79, respectively) compared to other LDL concentrations. After thawing chronologically (0 h, 2 h, and 4 h), it was found that 4% LDL and 20% egg yolk groups yielded significantly higher sperm motility (57.69±5.63 and 52.69± 17.15, respectively), than other LDL groups (p<0.05). In addition, 4% LDL group provided the significantly highest motility at 2 h. For plasma membrane integrity, 4% LDL group resulted in the highest plasma membrane integrity (p<0.05) at 0 h after thawing. At 2 h and 4 h, membrane integrity of all groups (except no LDL group) was not significantly different (p>0.05). For acrosome integrity, 4% LDL group yielded the highest acrosome integrity. However, acrosome integrity in all LDL-supplemented groups was not significantly different (p>0.05) at 0 h, 2 h, and 4 h after thawing.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the highest percentage of post-thawed spermatozoa motility was observed in 4% LDL group in all freezing times. However, that motility was not statistically different from 20% egg yolk-based extenders, which are routinely used for semen cryopreservation. Nevertheless, at 2 h post-thaw, spermatozoa motility from 4% LDL group was significantly higher than other groups. This was in agreement with the study on cryoprotective effect of LDL on bull semen motility, which demonstrated two folds higher motility from LDL supplementation than from egg yolk (Moussa et al., 2002; Amirat et al., 2004). Regarding the duration after freeze-thaw process, spermatozoa motility of all groups was highest at 0 h and declined chronologically. Cryoinjury of spermatozoa is caused by several aspects, including membrane disturbances and osmotic pressure changes, leading to cell volume change (Pena, 2007). The decrease in motility after freeze-thaw process might be caused by an active transport and a permeability alteration of plasma membrane in the tail region of spermatozoa (Yu et al., 2002). The previous study revealed that 8% LDL was the best concentration for ejaculated dog spermatozoa since it improved spermatozoa motility and plasma membrane integrity (Varela Junior et al., 2009). These results differed from our results where 4% LDL was the best concentration. This might be due to the differences in composition of the plasma membrane between ejaculated and epididymal spermatozoa, especially in surface component changes during epididymal maturation and sperm capacitation (Oliphant and Singhas, 1979) which makes the difference in cold shock susceptibility of spermatozoa (England, 1993). Moreover, our result showed a (England, 1993; White, 1993) decrease in motility when higher concentration of LDL was added. This might have been caused by a decrease in osmotic pressure of the extender when LDL concentration increased (Amirat et al., 2004).

For the plasma membrane integrity, 4% LDL group provided the best result at 0 h of post-thawed spermatozoa, suggesting that LDL possessed a beneficial cryoprotective effect on spermatozoa plasma membrane (England, 1993). This effect was due to LDL adhering to the cell membrane of spermatozoa (Graham and Foote, 1987; Bergeron et al., 2004), forming an interfacial film between fatty acids and water (Anton et al., 2003), and building a complex with seminal plasma proteins. This made them unavailable to function in the membrane (Manjunath and Therien, 2002; Bergeron et al., 2004), and prevented the loss of membrane phospholipids (Amirat et al., 2004). This could help protect spermatozoa during freeze-thaw process, because the spermatozoa membrane is composed of phospholipid and cholesterol which maintains the correct membrane fluidity and membrane permeability (White, 1993). Cryoinjury induces phospholipid phosphatidylserine translocation from inner to outer leaflets of plasma membrane which relates to membrane degeneration (Pena, 2007). This corresponds with the previous studies conducted in boar, bull, and stallion semen cryopreservation (Moussa et al., 2002; Amirat et al., 2004; Jiang et al., 2007; Canisso et al., 2008).

The highest percentage of acrosome integrity was found in the 4% LDL group. At 0 h post-thawed, it provided the better protection for the acrosome; acrosome integrity decreased when the storage time extended. Likewise, mammalian spermatozoa must undergo the physiological changes of capacitation in the female reproductive tract in order to penetrate oocytes (Yanagimachi and Bhattacharyya, 1988). Sperm capacitation is followed by acrosome reaction, which involves the breakdown and the fusion of the sperm plasma membrane and outer acrosomal membrane covering the anterior portion of the sperm head (Bedford, 1968; Yanagimachi and Usui, 1974). Consequently, during freezing process, the spermatozoa might have undergone the acrosome reaction (Yanagimachi and Usui, 1974). Egg yolk contains progesterone (Bowden et al., 2001) which plays an important role in the capacitation of spermatozoa in cattle (Witte and Schafer-Somi, 2007), horses (Aitken and McLaughlin, 2007), and humans (Wistrom and Meizel, 1993; Meyers et al., 1995). Progesterone is responsible for the capacitation of spermatozoa and therefore prejudicial to the preservation of spermatozoa during freezing (Bencharif et al., 2010). It has been reported that LDL contained a lower progesterone level than egg yolk due to the filtering effect of the dialysis procedure (Bencharif et al., 2008). It is, therefore, hypothesized that the extender containing LDL provided good protection for acrosome due to it containing a low level of progesterone. The investigation of acrosomal integrity following freezing and thawing is therefore an important parameter providing a qualitative assessment of sperm fertility (Bencharif et al., 2010).

In conclusion, LDL-supplemented extender enhanced canine epididymal spermatozoa quality during cryopreservation. The results from this study showed that the 4% LDL supplementation was the most suitable extender and yielded the better results for all spermatozoa quality parameters, especially for plasma membrane integrity than other LDL concentrations and egg yolk. At 0 h post-thawed, it provided better results; spermatozoa quality, which then decreased chronologically.

Plasma membrane integrity (%) of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each experimental group (mean±SD)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to sincerely thank The Veterinary Public Health Division of The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand for providing canine testicular samples. This study was financially supported by Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

References

Aitken RJ, McLaughlin EA. 2007;Molecular mechanisms of sperm capacitation: Progesterone-induced secondary calcium oscillations reflect the attainment of a capacitated state. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 63:273–293.
Amirat L, Tainturier D, Jeanneau L, Thorin C, Gerard O, Courtens JL, Anton M. 2004;Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: A comparison with Optidyl, a commercial egg yolk extender. Theriogenology 61:895–907.
Andersen K. 1975;Insemination with frozen dog semen based on a new insemination technique. Reprod Domest Anim 10:1–4.
Anton M, Martinet V, Dalgalarrondo M, Beaumal V, David-Briand E, Rabesona H. 2003;Chemical and structural characterisation of low-density lipoproteins purified from hen egg yolk. Food Chem 83:175–183.
Axner E, Hermansson U, Linde-Forsberg C. 2004;The effect of Equex STM paste and sperm morphology on post-thaw survival of cat epididymal spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 84:179–191.
Bedford JM. 1968;Ultrastructural changes in the sperm head during fertilization in the rabbit. Am J Anat 123:329–358.
Bencharif D, Amirat-Briand L, Garand A, Anton M, Schmitt E, Desherces S, Delhomme G, Langlois ML, Barriere P, Destrumelle S, Vera-Munoz O, Tainturier D. 2010;Freezing canine sperm: Comparison of semen extenders containing Equex and LDL (low density lipoproteins). Anim Reprod Sci 119:305–313.
Bencharif D, Amirat L, Anton M, Schmitt E, Desherces S, Delhomme G, Langlois ML, Barriere P, Larrat M, Tainturier D. 2008;The advantages of LDL (low density lipoproteins) in the cryopreservation of canine semen. Theriogenology 70:1478–1488.
Bergeron A, Crete MH, Brindle Y, Manjunath P. 2004;Low-density lipoprotein fraction from hen’s egg yolk decreases the binding of the major proteins of bovine seminal plasma to sperm and prevents lipid efflux from the sperm membrane. Biol Reprod 70:708–717.
Bowden RM, Ewert MA, Lipar JL, Nelson CE. 2001;Concentrations of steroid hormones in layers and biopsies of chelonian egg yolks. Gen Comp Endocrinol 121:95–103.
Canisso IF, Souza FA, Ortigoza JM, Carvalho GR, Davies-Morel MCG, Silva EC, Guimaraes JD, Lima AL. 2008;Freezing donkey semen (Equus asinus). Rev Inv Vet Peru 19:113–125.
Cheng FP, Fazeli A, Voorhout WF, Marks A, Bevers MM, Colenbrander B. 1996;Use of peanut agglutinin to assess the acrosomal status and the zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction in stallion spermatozoa. J Androl 17:674–682.
England GC. 1993;Cryopreservation of dog semen: A review. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 47:243–255.
Gao D, Critser JK. 2000;Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR J 41:187–196.
Graham JK, Foote RH. 1987;Effect of several lipids, fatty acyl chain length, and degree of unsaturation on the motility of bull spermatozoa after cold shock and freezing. Cryobiology 24:42–52.
Hewitt DA, Leahy R, Sheldon IM, England GCW. 2001;Cryopreservation of epididymal dog sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 67:101–111.
Hori T, Ichikawa M, Kawakami E, Tsutsui T. 2004;Artificial insemination of frozen epididymal sperm in beagle dogs. J Vet Med Sci 66:37–41.
Jiang ZL, Li QW, Li WY, Hu JH, Zhao HW, Zhang SS. 2007;Effect of low density lipoprotein on DNA integrity of freezing-thawing boar sperm by neutral comet assay. Anim Reprod Sci 99:401–407.
Kampschmidt RF, Mayer DT, Herman HA. 1953;Lipid and lipoprotein constituents of egg yolk in the resistance and storage of bull spermatozoa. J Dairy Sci 36:733–742.
Manee-In S, Parmornsupornvichit S, Kraiprayoon S, Tharasanit T, Chanapiwat P, Kaeoket K. 2014;L-carnitine supplemented extender improves cryopreserved-thawed cat epididymal sperm motility. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 27:791–796.
Manjunath P, Therien I. 2002;Role of seminal plasma phospholipid-binding proteins in sperm membrane lipid modification that occurs during capacitation. J Reprod Immunol 53:109–119.
Meyers SA, Overstreet JW, Liu IK, Drobnis EZ. 1995;Capacitation in vitro of stallion spermatozoa: Comparison of progesterone-induced acrosome reactions in fertile and subfertile males. J Androl 16:47–54.
Moussa M, Marinet V, Trimeche A, Tainturier D, Anton M. 2002;Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: cryoprotective effect on frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 57:1695–1706.
Oliphant G, Singhas CA. 1979;Iodination of rabbit sperm plasma membrane: Relationship of specific surface proteins to epididymal function and sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 21:937–944.
Pena FJ. 2007;Detecting subtle changes in sperm membranes in veterinary andrology. Asian J Androl 9:731–737.
Platz CC Jr, Seager SW. 1978;Semen collection by electroejaculation in the domestic cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 173:1353–1355.
Tittarelli C, Savignone CA, Arnaudin E, Stornelli MC, Stornelli MA, de la Sota RL. 2006;Effect of storage media and storage time on survival of spermatozoa recovered from canine and feline epididymides. Theriogenology 66:1637–1640.
Varela AS Junior, Corcini CD, Ulguim RR, Alvarenga MVF, Bianchi I, Correa MN, Lucia T Jr, Deschamps JC. 2009;Effect of low density lipoprotein on the quality of cryopreserved dog semen. Anim Reprod Sci 115:323–327.
White IG. 1993;Lipids and calcium uptake of sperm in relation to cold shock and preservation: A review. Reprod Fertil Dev 5:639–658.
Wistrom CA, Meizel S. 1993;Evidence suggesting involvement of a unique human sperm steroid receptor/Cl- channel complex in the progesterone-initiated acrosome reaction. Dev Biol 159:679–690.
Witte TS, Schafer-Somi S. 2007;Involvement of cholesterol, calcium and progesterone in the induction of capacitation and acrosome reaction of mammalian spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 102:181–193.
Yanagimachi R, Bhattacharyya A. 1988;Acrosome-reacted guinea pig spermatozoa become fusion competent in the presence of extracellular potassium ions. J Exp Zool 248:354–360.
Yanagimachi R, Usui N. 1974;Calcium dependence of the acrosome reaction and activation of guinea pig spermatozoa. Exp Cell Res 89:161–174.
Yu I, Songsasen N, Godke RA, Leibo SP. 2002;Differences among dogs in response of their spermatozoa to cryopreservation using various cooling and warming rates. Cryobiology 44:62–78.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Spermatozoa motility (%) and progressive motility of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each experimental group (mean±SD)

Fresh T0 T2 T4




Group/time Motility Progressive motility Motility Progressive motility Motility Progressive motility Motility Progressive motility
No LDL 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 3.03±4.80B,c 0.31±0.48 2.46±5.59B,d 0.08±0.28 1.00±2.77B,d 0.08±0.28
4% LDL 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 57.69±5.63B,a 3.69±0.25 51.15±9.16B,a 3.04±0.52 28.46±11.07C,a 1.69±0.72
8% LDL 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 38.46±15.86B,b 2.27±1.03 30.00±15.94B,c 1.81±0.97 12.69±9.71C,b,c 0.77±0.73
16% LDL 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 34.46±15.40B,b 2.12±0.98 26.38±13.57B,c 1.77±0.81 9.23±8.06C,c,d 0.54±0.52
24% LDL 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 32.92±18.91B,b 1.96±1.18 21.92±16.90C,c 1.27±1.07 9.08±8.48D,c,d 0.38±0.51
20% egg yolk 80.77±4.94A 4.54±0.51 52.69±17.15B,a 3.08±1.04 40.00±17.80C,b 2.38±1.08 21.54±11.62D,a,b 1.23±0.70

SD, standard deviation; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Values within the same column followed by the different small letter superscripts, and within the same row followed by the different capital letter superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05).

Table 2

Plasma membrane integrity (%) of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each experimental group (mean±SD)

Group/time Fresh T0 T2 T4
No LDL 74.88±5.86A 54.60±17.92B,b 45.62±19.24B,C,b 38.04±19.67C,b
4% LDL 74.88±5.86A 70.54±12.84A,a 62.19±12.42A,a 55.96±14.98B,a
8% LDL 74.88±5.86A 58.23±13.65B,b 53.85±11.42B,a,b 51.50±13.20B,a
16% LDL 74.88±5.86A 55.56±14.13B,b 52.27±11.30B,a,b 48.07±11.61B,a,b
24% LDL 74.88±5.86A 55.04±9.25B,b 52.19±11.55B,a,b 48.23±15.40B,a,b
20% egg yolk 74.88±5.86A 59.27±14.21B,b 54.77±12.42B,C,a,b 45.31±12.51C,a,b

SD, standard deviation; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Values within the same column followed by the different small letter superscripts, and within the same row followed by the different capital letter superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05).

Table 3

Sperm acrosome integrity (%) of caudal epididymal spermatozoa before freezing and after thawing for 0 h (T0), 2 h (T2), and 4 h (T4) in each treatment and control (mean±SD)

Group/time Fresh T0 T2 T4
No LDL 55.50±16.67A 18.96±14.64B,b 10.81±9.66B,C,b 3.85±4.28C,b
4% LDL 55.50±16.67A 46.58±10.79A,a 38.04±10.42A,B,a 28.77±15.53B,a
8% LDL 55.50±16.67A 37.38±15.23B,a 36.88±12.28B,a 24.50±14.32C,a
16% LDL 55.50±16.67A 36.62±14.59B,a 29.50±11.14B,C,a 21.96±11.67C,a
24% LDL 55.50±16.67A 38.19±18.38A,a 28.31±17.11B,C,a 22.88±14.91C,a
20% egg yolk 55.50±16.67A 39.46±19.25B,a 27.77±14.82C,a 19.77±10.79C,a

SD, standard deviation; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

Values within the same column followed by the different small letter superscripts, and within the same row followed by the different capital letter superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05).