2. Bergsma R, Kanis E, Knol EF, Bijma P. The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (
Sus scrofa). Genetics 2008; 178:1559–70.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.084236
3. Duijvesteijn N. Sociable swine: prospects of indirect genetic effects for the improvement of productivity, welfare and quality [Ph D thesis]. Wageningen, NL, USA: Wageningen University; 2014.
5. Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:4648–55.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2064
7. Sargolzaei M, Iwaisaki H, Colleau J. CFC: A tool for monitoring genetic diversity. In : 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2006 Aug 13–18; Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. CD-ROM Communication. 2006.
9. Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM, Bacheller LR, et al. Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluation. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93:2287–92.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2773
10. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Tsuruta S. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. J Anim Breed Genet 2011; 128:422–8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00912.x
11. Arango J, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Culbertson M, Herring W. Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts. J Anim Sci 2005; 83:1241–6.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8361241x
14. Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, et al. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In : The 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2002 Aug 19–23; Montpellier, France.
15. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93:743–52.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2730
17. Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Lawlor T. Choice of parameters for single-step genomic evaluation for type. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93:Suppl 1533
18. Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94:4198–204.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4256
19. Chen C, Misztal I, Aguilar I, et al. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: an example using broiler chickens. J Anim Sci 2011; 89:23–8.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3071
20. Koivula M, Strandén I, Pösö J, Aamand GP, Mäntysaari EA. Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:2775–84.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8975
21. Tsuruta S, Lourenco DAL, Misztal I. Bias in singlestep genomic evaluations attributable to unknown parent group estimates. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96:E-Suppl 175(Abstr.).
22. Onogi A, Komatsu T, Shoji N, et al. Genomic prediction in Japanese Black cattle: application of a single-step approach to beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2014; 92:1931–8.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7168
23. Harris BL, Winkelman A, Johnson D. Large-scale single-step genomic evaluation for milk production traits. In : Proceedings of the 2012 Interbull Meeting; 2012 May 28–31; Cork, Ireland. No. 46
25. Bergsma R, Mathur P, Kanis E, Verstegen MW, Knol EF, Van Arendonk JA. Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs. J Anim Sci 2013; 91:3601–11.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-6200
26. Chen CY, Kachman SD, Johnson RK, Newman S, Van Vleck LD. Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects. J Anim Sci 2008; 86:2525–30.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0660
27. Putz A, Tiezzi F, Maltecca C, Gray KA, Knauer MT. A comparison of accuracy validation methods for genomic and pedigree-based predictions of swine litter size traits using Large White and simulated data. J Anim Breed Genet 2018; 135:5–13.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12302
28. Martini JWR, Schrauf MF, Garcia-Baccino CA, et al. The effect of the H-1 scaling factors τ and ω on the structure of H in the single-step procedure. Genet Sel Evol 2017; 50:16
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0386-x
30. Alemu SW, Bijma P, Møller SH, Janss L, Berg P. Indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (
Neovison vison). Genet Sel Evol 2014; 46:30
https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-46-30
34. Reimert I, Rodenburg TB, Ursinus WW, et al. Backtest and novelty behavior of female and castrated male piglets, with diverging social breeding values for growth. J Anim Sci 2013; 91:4589–97.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6673
35. Reimert I, Rodenburg TB, Ursinus WW, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Responses to novel situations of female and castrated male pigs with divergent social breeding values and different backtest classifications in barren and straw-enriched housing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2014; 151:24–35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.11.015
36. Samorè AB, Fontanesi L. Genomic selection in pigs: state of the art and perspectives. Italian J Anim Sci 2016; 15:211–32.
37. D’Eath R, Conington J, Lawrence A, Olsson I, Sandøe P. Breeding for behavioural change in farm animals: practical, economic and ethical considerations. Anim Welf 2010; 19:17–27.
38. Rodenburg T, Bijma P, Ellen E, et al. Breeding amiable animals? Improving farm animal welfare by including social effects in breeding programmes. Anim Welf 2010; 19: Suppl 177–82.
39. Camerlink I, Ursinus WW, Bijma P, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour. Behav Genet 2015; 45:117–26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9671-9
40. Hong JK, Jeong YD, Cho ES, et al. A genome-wide association study of social genetic effects in landrace pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018; 31:784–90.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0440
41. Hong JK, Kim KH, Hwang HS, Lee JK, Eom TK, Rhim SJ. Behaviors and body weight of suckling piglets in different social environments. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30:902–6.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0653